Supreme Court Decides Bowman v. Monsanto Co.

by David Berry on May 13, 2013

The Supreme Court ruled today in Bowman v. Monsanto Co., holding that the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not protect the use of patented genetically-modified seed to cultivate a new crop. The court reasoned that the replanting was a “making” of the invention, because germination resulted in a copying of the seed’s genetic material, and therefore was outside the type of downstream use or sale protected by exhaustion. See the Patlit Blog for a discussion of the decision.

{ 0 comments }

Stalemate in CLS v. Alice

by David Berry on May 10, 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. today.  In 7 opinions spanning 135 or so pages, the court affirmed the determination that the method, media and system claims were all ineligible. But the judges could not agree on a cogent approach for determining eligibility of computer-implemented processes and related inventions under 35 U.S.C.   § 101  (which was the purpose for granting en banc review). So it looks like the issue will continue to fester.  As Chief Judge Rader notes in his opinion,

No portion of any opinion issued today other than our Per Curiam Judgment garners a majority. The court is evenly split on the patent eligibility of the system claims. Although a majority of the judges on the court agree that the method claims do not recite patent eligible subject matter, no majority of those judges agrees as to the legal rationale for that conclusion. Accordingly, though much is published today discussing the proper approach to the patent eligibility inquiry, nothing said today beyond our judgment has the weight of precedent.

Rader Concur Op. at 1 n.1. The decision (or lack thereof)  is HERE.

{ 0 comments }

Judge Cohn Profiled

by David Berry on April 24, 2013

cohnsmallThe Center for Michigan publication, Bridge, recently published a profile of U.S. District Court Judge Avern Cohn.  The article reports that,  ”Although Cohn runs his courtroom with an iron fist and often has little patience with lawyers who show up unprepared for court or who lack his mental agility, attorneys praise him for his fairness, legal knowledge and willingness to reconsider his decisions.”  It also reveals that he lists “work” and “reading” as his hobbies. The full article is HERE.

{ 0 comments }

by David Berry on April 17, 2013

untitled

{ 0 comments }

Detroit World IP Day Program Announced For April 26

April 11, 2013

The 13th annual World IP Day is a collaboration between the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Its purpose is to promote and secure creative ideas, including music, art, trademarks, writings and inventions. Today, 185 member states have joined the WIPO to develop international standards for the protection of [...]

Read the full article →

MJ Grand Recommends Severing John Doe Defendants in BitTorrent Copyright Infringement Action

April 8, 2013

Third Degree Films, Inc v. John Does 1-72, Case No. 12-cv-14106, 2013 WL 1164024 (E.D. Mich. March 18, 2013). Plaintiff Third Degree Films, Inc. (TDF) filed suit against 72 John Doe defendants, alleging that they used the BitTorrent file-sharing protocol to download infringing copies of the adult film “Teens in Tight Jeans.” Two defendants moved [...]

Read the full article →

MIPLA To Present Susan Kornfield on TM and Copyright On April 16

April 8, 2013

The Michigan Intellectual Property Law Association’s April meeting will be held on April 16, 2013 at the Somerset Inn in Troy Michigan. The featured speaker will  be Susan Kornfield of Bodman LLC, who will present “What you missed in the rest of the IP World when you were stressing out over the AIA!”  Susan will provide an update on [...]

Read the full article →

DJ Ludington Grants In Part Motion To Exclude Trade Secret Expert

March 26, 2013

Dow Corning Corp. v. Jie Xiao, Case No. 11-11008-BC WL992773 (E.D. Mich., Mar 13, 2013). U.S. District Judge Thomas L. Ludington granted in part plaintiff’s motion to exclude evidence of defendant’s expert witness, as the evidence violated Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 704. Dow Corning and Hemlock Semiconductor brought suit against Dr. Jie Xiao [...]

Read the full article →

DJ Ludington Grants MTD In Patent DJ Action

March 22, 2013

Dow Corning Compound Semiconductor Solutions, LLC v. Cree, Inc., Case No. 11–14255, 2013 WL 993701 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2013). In a recent ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction between Dow Corning Semiconductor Solutions, LLC (www.dowcorning.com) and Cree, Inc. (www.cree.com), the U.S. District Judge Thomas L. Ludington GRANTED the [...]

Read the full article →

DJ Cohn Rules Mich Court of Claims Act Does Not Bar Compulsory Counterclaim Against State Agency

March 20, 2013

Regents of the University of Michigan v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Case No. 12–1290, 2013 WL 673797 (E.D. Mich., Feb. 25, 2013). U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn denied the University of Michigan’s motion to dismiss a compulsory counterclaim on the grounds that the defendant, St. Jude Medical, Inc., did not comply with the Michigan Court of [...]

Read the full article →